Verisimilitude: a causal approach
نویسنده
چکیده
I present a new definition of verisimilitude, framed in terms of causes. Roughly speaking, according to it a scientific model is approximately true if it captures accurately the strengths of the causes present in any given situation. Against much of the literature, I argue that any satisfactory account of verisimilitude must inevitably restrict its judgments to context-specific models rather than general theories. We may still endorse—and only need—a relativized notion of scientific progress, understood now not as global advance but rather as the mastering of particular problems. This also sheds new light on longstanding difficulties surrounding language-dependence and models committed to false ontologies.
منابع مشابه
The path analysis controversy: a new statistical approach to strong appraisal of verisimilitude.
A new approach for using path analysis to appraise the verisimilitude of theories is described. Rather than trying to test a model's truth (correctness), this method corroborates a class of path diagrams by determining how well they predict intradata relations in comparison with other diagrams. The observed correlation matrix is partitioned into disjoint sets. One set is used to estimate the mo...
متن کاملPoint-free Geometry, Approximate Distances and Verisimilitude of Theories
We propose a metric approach to Popper’s verisimilitude question which is related with point-free geometry. Indeed, we define the theory of approximate metric spaces whose primitive notion are regions, inclusion relation, minimum distance, and maximum distance between regions. Then, we show that the class of possible scientific theories has a structure of approximate metric space. So, we can de...
متن کاملScientific Progress, Verisimilitude, and Evidence
The verisimilitudinarian approach to scientific progress (VS) is the view that progress can be accounted for in terms of the increasing verisimilitude or, equivalently, truthlikeness, or approximation to the truth, of our theories. In this paper, I defend VS against the criticism, levelled by Bird (2007), that it exhibits an unacceptable lack of interest in the issue of the grounding of scienti...
متن کاملZwart and Franssen's impossibility theorem holds for possible-world-accounts but not for consequence-accounts to verisimilitude
Zwart and Franssen’s impossibility theorem reveals a conflict between the possible-world-based content-definition and the possible-world-based likeness-definition of verisimilitude. In Sect. 2 we show that the possible-world-based content-definition violates four basic intuitions of Popper’s consequence-based content-account to verisimilitude, and therefore cannot be said to be in the spirit of...
متن کاملTruthlikeness, Rationality And Scientific Method
I. A. Kieseppä’s criticism of the methodological use of the theory of verisimilitude, and D. B. Resnik’s arguments against the explanation of scientific method by appeal to scientific aims are critically considered. Since the notion of verisimilitude was introduced as an attempt to show that science can be seen as a rational enterprise in the pursuit of truth, defenders of the verisimilitude pr...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
- Synthese
دوره 190 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2013